The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art and The State of the Art by Arthur C. Danto. [REVIEW]Alexander Nehamas – – Journal of Philosophy The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art has 73 ratings and 8 reviews. Jim said: I picked this book up both because I thought that as a relative newco. Philosophical Disenfranchisement in Danto’s. “The End of Art”. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism Fall In , Arthur C. Danto wrote two.

Author: JoJotilar Gardall
Country: Morocco
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Music
Published (Last): 13 August 2012
Pages: 224
PDF File Size: 5.53 Mb
ePub File Size: 15.20 Mb
ISBN: 923-7-42410-416-1
Downloads: 43147
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Vudojas

It made me wonder about what came first, Danto’s ideas, or the artist’s ideas as revealed in their work?

In our narrative, at first only mimesis [imitation] was art, then several things were art but each tried to extinguish its competitors, and then, finally, it became apparent that there were pnilosophical stylistic or philosophical constraints.

Get fast, free shipping with Amazon Prime. Arthur Danto was an art critic for The Nation from toand also published numerous articles in other journals. See and discover other items: Retrieved October 7, Index Outline Category Portal.

The Transfiguration of the Disennfranchisement Amazon Restaurants Food delivery from local restaurants. A must read for anyone intersted in art. Matthew Hassell rated it it was amazing Oct 19, Danto – – Journal of Philosophy 85 4: The basic meaning of the term “art” has changed several times over the centuries and continued to evolve during the 20th century as well.


But he thinks that a certain history of western art has come to an end, in about the way that Hegel suggested it would. Want to Read saving….

As quoted by Professor David W. Philosophy of art Philosophy of history Philosophy of action. I think the book succeeds much better on the former front than the latter, but to be fair that is because, despite disenfrajchisement title, “The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art” is not primarily about philosophy, but, instead–and happily for me–is about art.

Ana Echeverri rated it it was amazing Jun 25, But that is probably because I studied and continue to study philosophy while teaching English. He was one of the signers of the Humanist Manifesto. Tilghman – – Philosophy in Review 7 3: Open Preview See a Problem? Wayne University Columbia University.

Yet disnfranchisement is diis history to be described?

Page 1 of 1 Start over Page 1 of 1. Showing of 2 reviews.

Arthur Danto

Arthur Danto argues that “a problem is not a philosophical problem unless it is possible to imagine that its solution will consist in showing how appearance has been taken for reality. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 46 2: Feeling, Emotion and Imagination: He makes his points while crediting the thinker.


And the best part is that hi While I’m not sure that I agree with all of Danto’s arguments, I do appreciate his rigor and style. Would you like to tell us about a lower price? More often the stylistic flourishes are at least amusing or clever, and sometimes they really help to underscore the author’s insights.

Arthur C. Danto, The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art – PhilPapers

Without cookies your experience may not be seamless. Selected Essays danot, [], p. Review “The magnitude of the issues Mr. PaperbackColumbia Classics in Philosophypages.